Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Annals of Coloproctology ; : 28-35, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-925437

ABSTRACT

Purpose@#Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) was developed to overcome surgical difficulties experienced in distal pelvic dissection. Concerns have been raised about potential worse postoperative functional outcomes after TaTME. Also, the oncological safety was questioned. This study aimed to describe the functional, surgical, oncological outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after TaTME. @*Methods@#All consecutive TaTME cases for rectal cancer without disseminated disease between December 2016 and April 2019 were included. The Wexner incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score, fecal incontinence-related QoL, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-core questionnaire and 29-item module (EORTC QLQ-C30/CR29) were collected. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate local recurrence-free survival. @*Results@#Thirty patients were eligible for analysis of which 23 received questionnaires. Response rate was 74%. After a median follow-up of respectively 20.0 and 23.0 months for functional and oncological outcomes, the median (interquartile range) of Wexner incontinence and LARS scores were 9.0 (7.0–12.0) and 33.1 (25.0–39.0). Major LARS was present in 73.3%. Fecal incontinence, general and colorectal-specific QoL subdomains that are associated with poor bowel function scored in line with previously reported data. The 2-year actuarial cumulative local recurrence rate was 3.7% (95% confidence interval, 2.4%–5.0%). @*Conclusion@#TaTME may lead to significant functional impairments. Patients should receive preoperative counseling on this topic and be fully aware of the potential consequences of their treatment. Oncological data were in line with other short- to moderate-term data and did not show alarming results.

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-200953

ABSTRACT

Background:Controversial evidence currently exists regarding the feasibility and effectiveness to improve preoperative aerobic fitness during home-based prehabilitation in patients scheduled for liver or pancreatic resection, whereas morbidity rates are high following these resections. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the preoperative oxygen uptake (VO2) at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold before and after a four-week home-based preoperative training program with nutritional supplementation in high-riskpatients scheduled for elective liver or pancreatic resection. Secondary aims are to evaluate program feasibility, immune system function, cardiopulmonary exercise test responses, individual progression profiles on training responses, quality of life, andpostoperative course.Methods:In this multicenter study with a pretest-posttest design, patients with a liver or pancreatic tumor scheduled for elective resection will be recruited. To select the high-risk fraction of this surgical population, their VO2at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold should be <11 ml/kg/min for final inclusion. A planned total of 24 high-risk patients will participate in a four-week (three sessions per week) home-based bimodal prehabilitation program. The partly supervised home-based preoperative training program consists of individualized goal setting followed by titration of interval and endurance training on an advanced cycle ergometer, combined with functional task exercises. Additionally, patients will be given protein and vitamin/mineral supplementation.Discussion: Effects of a partly supervised home-based bimodal prehabilitation regimen are unknown in high-risk patients opting for liver or pancreatic resection. Improved preoperative aerobic fitness might translate into improved postoperative outcomes and a reduced demand on care resources.Trial Registration:The study is registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry (NL6151) and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands (P17-08)

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL